Recently, various localities have stepped up their efforts to introduce talents, and the once unbreakable "settlement" policy has loosened. Coupled with the recent implementation of the "Opinions on Promoting the Reform of the Institutional Mechanism and Mechanism for the Social Mobility of Labor and Talent" issued by the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the General Office of the State Council, the registration system has ushered in tremendous changes. Under this circumstance, there are voices that the opening of the residence is to find someone to “take over” the real estate, and the regulation of the property market must be released. In fact, after the Central Economic Work Conference and the National Housing and Urban-Rural Construction Work Conference successively reiterated that "housing and living are not speculated," this kind of muddled fish is not tenable.
Looking back on 2019, all parts of the country have actively implemented the urban main responsibility system, steadily pushed forward the "one city, one policy" pilot, and the real estate has maintained a stable operation as a whole, achieving the goal of stabilizing land prices, housing prices, and expectations. At the same time, the property market's regulation and control policy has a clear direction, and the number of cities in which the property market has cooled has continued to increase. Against the background of the industry's overall volume of commercial housing, the overall rise in housing prices has been effectively controlled.
At present, the regulation and control policies of the property market in various regions have stabilized, and there are fewer cities and regions with relaxed policies. Most cities still maintain high control and regulation. Especially after Kaifeng and Zhangjiagang have undergone "one-day tours" of policy relaxation, localities are more cautious about loosening control.
It is worth noting that the Opinions on the Reform of the Institutional Mechanism and Mechanism for Promoting the Social Mobility of Labor and Talents proposed that the restrictions on the settlement of cities with a permanent population of less than 3 million in the urban areas be comprehensively lifted, and the settlement conditions for large cities with 3 to 5 million permanent residents in the urban areas be fully relaxed . Prior to this, some regions also introduced some policies to relax settlement and talent introduction.
In this regard, the relevant person in charge of the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security stated that the introduction of relevant policies is mainly to promote the reform of the social mobility mechanism of labor and talents, to form a reasonable, fair, smooth, and orderly social mobility to further liberate and develop society. Productive forces to achieve sustained and healthy economic development.
Yao Jingyuan, a special researcher in the counselor's office of the State Council and former chief economist of the National Bureau of Statistics, also said that for the economy to be dynamic, the free flow of talents is very important, and the continuous absorption of talents is the key to a better city development. For cities with severe population aging, the future should attract more populations and inject new vitality into urban development.
"In 2019, the policy of directly relaxing the regulation of the property market can be described as rare." Zhang Bo, president of 58 Anju Guest House and Property Research Institute, analyzed that from the perspective of relaxing the restrictions on talent purchase, most of them provided corresponding subsidies and reduced or eliminated talents. Home purchase threshold. It is not difficult to see that the real purpose of introducing talent policies in various places is to attract talents. The policy itself contains more content, and talent purchase is only part of it. Therefore, talent policy cannot be equated with relaxation of regulation.
It is worth noting that there are still many things worth considering in the talent policies of various places. On the one hand, the introduction of talents in various places is mainly based on academic qualifications or professional titles, not "introducing counterparts". This situation is outstanding in second- and third-tier cities. On the other hand, it is not ruled out that some cities have achieved the effect of loosening control in disguise through the introduction of talents, especially when the threshold for talent introduction has been lowered too much. This tendency is particularly evident.
In response, Jia Jinjing, director of the Macro Research Department of the Chongyang Institute of Finance of Renmin University of China, said that the industrial development of different cities is different, and the required talents are also different. For example, cities such as Beijing and Shanghai at the stage of industrial innovation are more attractive to R & D talents. Those cities whose industrial clusters are expanding are more attractive to other types of talent. Promoting population flows in accordance with their respective needs will help match talent more rationally.
Looking forward to the property market in 2020, China will adhere to the positioning of houses for living and not speculation for a long time, not using real estate as a means to stimulate the economy in the short term, continue to implement the long-term mechanism of stable and healthy development of the real estate market and strive to establish and improve Institutional mechanisms for real estate regulation. Regardless of whether the real estate market is good or bad, the control of the property market will not be relaxed.
Overall, the property market regulation will continue to remain strict and strict in 2020. Regulation will not be relaxed and stability will prevail. It can be said that the idea of finding a "receiver" for the property market is totally untenable. (Economic Daily, China Economic Network reporter Wang Yichen)